Corentin Denolly vs Johan Nikles Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L W L L
Form
W L L L L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Denolly 3 - 0 Nikles
They have played 7 sets in total, with Denolly winning 6 and Nikles winning 1. The last match between Denolly and Nikles was at the M25 Hammamet, 02-02-2024, Quarterfinals, Clay with Corentin Denolly getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Corentin Denolly | 3 |
| Johan Nikles | 0 |
M25 Hammamet(02-02-2024)
6
1
6
4
| Denolly | Stats | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (10-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (9-8) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 283 | Ranking | 647 |
| 269 | Highest Rank | 256 |
| 27 | Age | 28 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 4 |
| 63% (412-245) | Career Total W/L | 58% (296-214) |
| $56,935 | Career Prize Money | $11,650 |
| 3 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Corentin Denolly
Player
Johan Nikles
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Johan Nikles
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 1-6 6-2 6-0 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Johan Nikles
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 37 | Games Won | 18 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:24:40 | Average Match Time | 1:24:40 |
| 69% (119/173) | 1st Serve % | 67% (129/192) |
| 66% (79/119) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (62/129) |
| 52% (28/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (28/63) |
| 59% (17/29) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (7/18) |
| 53% (102/192) | Return Points Win % | 38% (66/173) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Corentin Denolly
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Blaise Bicknell
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Corentin Denolly
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Brandon Holt
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
89 of
129)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
123
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Johan Nikles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
55 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Johan Nikles
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Alexis Canter
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Billy Suarez
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guillaume Dalmasso
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Johan Nikles
92%
(
48 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Johan Nikles
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Johan Nikles
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Tuncay Duran
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (412/245) | Win/Loss | 58% (296/214) |
| 60% (900/599) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (656/508) |
| 54% (7528/6445) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5652/5041) |
| 56% (61/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (88/55) |
| 66% (293/150) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (200/138) |
| 55% (58/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28% (8/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 1998 | Aces Total | 312 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1887 | Total Double Faults | 1069 |
| 1:26:44 | Average Match Time | 1:22:31 |
| 499.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 493.77 |
| 65% (26404/40626) | 1st Serve % | 67% (19233/28865) |
| 67% (17798/26404) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (11637/19233) |
| 49% (6925/14223) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4575/9632) |
| 45% (2081/4615) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1657/3590) |
| 43% (17578/41276) | Return Points Win % | 45% (13120/29098) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/1) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (52/66) | Challenger W/L | 51% (42/41) |
| 67% (355/175) | Futures W/L | 60% (250/165) |
| 63% (409/648) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (292/502) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (101/179) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (58/108) |
| 59% (114/192) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (83/150) |
| 90% (397/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (278/244) |
| 10% (397/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (278/33) |
| 21% (260/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (232/52) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
